Obama Links Jihad To Global Warming And Second Amendment
December 6, 2016
President Barack Obama linked “climate change” and the Second Amendment to the threat of Islamic terrorism – which he described as “violent extremism” – during a Tuesday address at Macdill Air Force Base in Tampa, FL.
Obama claimed that Islamic terrorism was partly driven by food and water scarcity brought about by anthropogenic global warming. “A changing climate is increasing competition for food and water,” he said of Syria and other Muslim-majority and conflict-ridden failed states.
From Plato‘s “Republic”, through Thomas Moores “Utopia” and the various statist writings from the Fabian Socialist, Stalin and Mao one thing is fundamental to all and that is a lie must be told to the populace.
So it’s no wonder that Saul Alinsky wrote the means justify the end and it’s no wonder that the followers of these writings or those hoping to accomplish a similar governing construct accept this as necessary.
It also imparts a status to the statist of ‘expert’, knowing what is best, and because they know better than you the lie is justified.
Watch Jonathan Gruber, one of the principal architects of Obamacare, perfectly illustrate this…
Many Obama supporters were furious with him for not bringing up the many issues used in his campaign ads. These would be the negative ads. Obama new he couldn’t bring these to the table because they were either petty, unsubstantiated or blatant lies. For instance, if he would have brought up Bain Capital it would have opened the door for Romney to explain what Bain Capital did and his leadership position at Bain. This would have been devastating for a clear explanation of those facts would have painted a picture of just the kind of experience and leadership that is needed at this time for our failing economy.
Then there are those who say Obama was “off his game” that night, even going to the extreme to say he hadn’t had time to adjust to the altitude in Denver. These folks must have a short memory because when Obama gave his 2008 party nomination victory speech in Mile High Stadium his rhetoric was soaring with teleprompter perfection.
I say, what you saw at the first Presidential Debate was Obama’s game. During the 2008 campaign the media did not vet Obama. All the public saw was hope and change wrapped in swagger. Any attempt to vet Obama was painted as petty, hateful and most often racist. This tactic was even used against Bill Clinton. So we had a media that didn’t do it’s job. We were not allowed to learn about the man and difficult questions were not asked of him. He didn’t really have much of a record to look at and what he had was protected by a twisted political correctness as well as Obama distancing himself from past associations. Now Obama has a record and the facts speak for themselves and empty rhetoric will not change the facts nor stand up against a prepared opponent with leadership experience.
Obama always uses a teleprompter when speaking, even at press conferences and the only glimpses of the man afforded us have been those few moments when he’s been caught without a teleprompter.
Any man that reaches this level should take responsibility and be held accountable for his record. This is the character and realization of this office that makes the job so overwhelming. The final decisions are made in that Office and for that reason Truman had “The Buck Stops Here” on his desk leaving no room for doubt where the responsibility lay. Again this only emphasizes just how monumental the job of POTUS is. This is something a CEO realizes as well for they are in the same position when running a large enterprise. This is something Romney, as a former CEO not only realizes but has done and done successfully.
But if you must blame someone other than Obama for his poor performance in this debate, then that blame should go to the press. Never has any President had such an adoring media. During his term in office they have never asked tough questions nor followed up when he skirted their questions with empty rhetoric. He surrounds himself with like-minded yes men and so has never had to face the fire. No one has talked to Obama or questioned Obama the way Romney did during the debate and Obama did not have the experience to defend himself or his policies just as he did not have the leadership experience needed for the office of President in the first place. This time there was a record which could be questioned and Romney questioned it aggressively with rebuttals that outlined a vision that was clear and not based on vague emotive slogans.
The simple fact:
Obama lost the debate and you saw the real Obama.
At a press event July 25th Rahm Emanuel lambasted Chick-fil-A
“Chick-fil-A’s values are not Chicago values. They’re not respectful of our residents, our neighbors and our family members. And if you’re gonna be part of the Chicago community, you should reflect Chicago values,” Emanuel said Wednesday.
That very same day he met and praised the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan who is openly anti-Semitic as well as anti-gay. If Farrakhan had his way homosexuals would be killed. Yet Emanuel is praising and welcomes his help.
Emanuel worked for a president that was also against gay marriage for the entire time he worked for him. As White House Chief of Staff for Barack Obama Rahm had no problem with Obama’s belief in traditional marriage between a man and a woman.
If this man and his ilk don’t define “The Chicago Way” then I don’t know what does. This takes hypocrisy to a whole new level buy hey, it’s The Chicago Way”. Alinsky would be proud.
What is so amazing is he and others like him in their arrogance are increasingly being openly hypocritical to stir up their base pandering for votes. And the media tags right along.
What is so sad is there are those that drink their kool-aid.
Chicago Now Publius Forum: Emanuel’s ‘Chicago Values’ Includes Supporting Gay-Hating, Jew-Hating Louis Farrakhan
Wikipedia: there definition: in or at that place. →
Director for the “Initiative on Educational Excellence”
He was named to the post on Dec. 7, 2011, to assist President Obama’s efforts to improve the academic achievement of Hispanic students. He has been in the administration as an adviser since April 2009, and most recently served as the White House Initiative’s deputy director since Feb. 1, 2010.
Who is he?
He has worked for the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant Rights and New Leaders for new Schools program. He is a disciple of Mike Klonsky who created the small schools movement. Rico was a principal at Multicultural Arts High School for awhile in Chicago in this movement, 75% Hispanic and 25% black, and failed. Or rather his school did–very poor rating. Rico has worked with La Raza, a racist organization promoting hyper-loyalty to Mexico and which advocates taking over a number of southwestern states.
Another Chicago Alinskyite.
Worked closely and recently with Bill Ayers.
Worked with Mike Clonskey. You probably know who Bill Ayers is, the unrepentant terrorist of the 60’s SDS but you may not know so much about Mark Clonskey.
Active in education reform
National Secretary of the SDS
Founder of the Marxist/Leninist wing of the Communist Party
Has actively called for the overthrow of the United States
Mao’s successor praised him for his efforts to spread communism
Blogged for Obama’s campaign until he was called out for being a Communist
Just the kind of guy you need when “fundamentally transforming” America. Just the kind of guy you need defining educational excellence.
Did Congress vet and approve this guy? Of course not. He was a “special appointment” by Obama.
If Rico had needed Senate approval instead of appointment by presidential fiat he wouldn’t have passed the sniff test, but recently Obama has decided to by-pass Congress on virtually everything.
The founders knew that only an informed populace could be free. Obama counts on an uninformed populace.
And remember if “the end justifies the means” (Alinsky) is honesty really necessary?
high labor cost
high fuel cost
How many jobs do you think this will impact?
Now just think how this administration has handled those two areas. Unions and Energy.
Unions are coddled (read: in bed with) and supported while energy production is demonized and has stalled.
This as Obama hits the road again to promote his “Jobs Bill” which is really a tour to setup the basis for his 2012 reelection campaign.
Obama has been out touting his new jobs bill.
If you love me, pass the bill.
Just think about that.
POTUS saying “If you love me…”?
That’s just beyond comprehension.
First, it’s not about you. We don’t pass bills because of our feelings toward you. Passing a bill has nothing to do with that. It’s not about you.
Second, Bills are passed on merit and we don’t know the details of the bill. It has not been introduced to Congress. How can we get behind something we know nothing about?
Nancy Pelosi said we would find out what was in the health bill once it passed. Is this becoming a trend? Are we the people just that insignificant.
Meanwhile, while Obama’s been out looking for love:
President Obama repeatedly asked members of Congress to pass the American Jobs Act last week. But when no Democrat filed Obama’s bill after he presented it to Congress, a conservative congressman swiped the name for his own legislation.
Louie Gohmert: We finely got the 155 page bill and it scares me (emailed to lawmakers on Monday afternoon). I wrote mine in two pages. . . .
- GOP rep. introduces alternative American Jobs Act (THE HILL)
- Conservative Nabs Naming Rights to ‘American Jobs Act’ After Obama Delay (The Foundry)
I’m not even going to write anything. The images, video and net reaction say it better than I ever could.
Here’s just one reason why he’s so upset. This is from Facebook. The tweats on twitter are also priceless.
The “Make Fun Of ‘Atackwatch’ Thread!” Comedy Gold!!!!
Funny as these are and as encouraging as many American’s reactions are, this is still pretty scary for a sitting President.